Core 2 Duo E8200 vs Xeon E5504
Description
The E8200 is based on Core architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.7 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.7 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
106a5
Core
Wolfdale
Gainestown
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2008
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
15.77k points
10.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.39k points
41.95k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8200
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
4.57k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
6.62k
3.07k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
1.85k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
1.43k (x0.4)
TOTAL
15.77k
10.92k (x0.69)
Multithread
E8200
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
5.83k
19.07k (x3.27)
Test#2 (FP)
12.64k
12.52k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
7.97k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.95k
2.39k (x1.23)
TOTAL
25.39k
41.95k (x1.65)
Performance/W
E8200
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
391 points/W
524 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8200
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
1124 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2481 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1349 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
5912 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4