Core 2 Duo E8200 vs E6600
Description
Both models E8200 and E6600 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the E6600 gets 16.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.6 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the E6600 gets 16.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.6 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
6f6
Core
Wolfdale
Conroe
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2008
July 2006
Mean monothread perf.
15.77k points
9.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.39k points
16.12k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8200
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
2.7k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
6.62k
2.42k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.41k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
2.46k (x0.68)
TOTAL
15.77k
9.99k (x0.63)
Multithread
E8200
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.83k
5.19k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
12.64k
4.55k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
4.6k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.95k
1.78k (x0.91)
TOTAL
25.39k
16.12k (x0.63)
Performance/W
E8200
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
80 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
70 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
391 points/W
248 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8200
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1124 points/GHz
1125 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2481 points/GHz
1009 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1349 points/GHz
1025 points/GHz
TOTAL
5912 points/GHz
4164 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4