| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E8200 vs Celeron J4105


Description
The E8200 is based on Core architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.4 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
706a1
Core
Wolfdale
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2008
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
15.77k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.39k points
61.49k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8200
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
4.9k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
6.62k
7.26k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.75k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
3.32k (x0.92)
TOTAL
15.77k
18.22k (x1.16)

Multithread

E8200

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
5.83k
18.84k (x3.23)
Test#2 (FP)
12.64k
27.45k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
10.35k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.95k
4.85k (x2.49)
TOTAL
25.39k
61.49k (x2.42)

Performance/W
E8200
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
391 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
E8200
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1124 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2481 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1349 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
5912 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4