Core 2 Duo E8200 vs Celeron E3300
Description
Both models E8200 and E3300 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
1067a
Core
Wolfdale
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
1024 kB
Date
January 2008
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
15.77k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.39k points
24.6k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8200
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
2.9k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
6.62k
6.38k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.59k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
1.08k (x0.3)
TOTAL
15.77k
12.94k (x0.82)
Multithread
E8200
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
5.83k
5.76k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
12.64k
12.67k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
5.16k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.95k
1.01k (x0.52)
TOTAL
25.39k
24.6k (x0.97)
Performance/W
E8200
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
391 points/W
378 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8200
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1124 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2481 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1349 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
5912 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4