Core 2 Duo E8200 vs Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Description
The E8200 is based on Core architecture while the 4200+ is based on K8.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the 4200+ gets 17.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.4 times faster than the 4200+. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the 4200+ gets 17.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.4 times faster than the 4200+. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
40fb2
Core
Wolfdale
Brisbane
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket AM2
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
2x512 kB
Date
January 2008
January 2007
Mean monothread perf.
15.77k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.39k points
17.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8200
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
2.88k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
6.62k
3.98k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
0.72k (x0.2)
TOTAL
15.77k
9.57k (x0.61)
Multithread
E8200
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
5.83k
5.58k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
12.64k
7.67k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
3.88k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.95k
0.7k (x0.36)
TOTAL
25.39k
17.83k (x0.7)
Performance/W
E8200
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
86 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76 points/W
60 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
11 points/W
TOTAL
391 points/W
274 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8200
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
1124 points/GHz
1308 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2481 points/GHz
1807 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
911 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1349 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
5912 points/GHz
4352 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4