Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Pentium Dual-Core E5400
Description
Both models E7400 and E5400 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7400 gets a score of 25.7 k points while the E5400 gets 26.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5400 is 1 times faster than the E7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7400 gets a score of 25.7 k points while the E5400 gets 26.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5400 is 1 times faster than the E7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
1067a
Core
Wolfdale
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
October 2008
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
14.31k points
14.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.71k points
26.78k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E7400
E5400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.54k
2.47k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
6.56k
6.37k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.73k
2.66k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.83k
1.24k (x0.68)
TOTAL
13.66k
12.75k (x0.93)
Multithread
E7400
E5400
Test#1 (Integers)
5.08k
4.95k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
13.07k
12.7k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.34k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.62k
1.21k (x0.74)
TOTAL
25.29k
24.2k (x0.96)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E7400
E5400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.19k
3.09k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
7.02k
6.94k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.71k
2.77k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.39k
1.22k (x0.87)
TOTAL
14.31k
14.01k (x0.98)
Multithread
E7400
E5400
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
6.18k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
13.23k
13.82k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.57k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
1.21k (x0.9)
TOTAL
25.71k
26.78k (x1.04)
Performance/W
E7400
E5400
Test#1 (Integers)
93 points/W
95 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
204 points/W
213 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
86 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
21 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
396 points/W
412 points/W
Performance/GHz
E7400
E5400
Test#1 (Integers)
1139 points/GHz
1143 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2507 points/GHz
2570 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
969 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
496 points/GHz
450 points/GHz
TOTAL
5111 points/GHz
5187 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4