Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Core i5-2520M
Description
The E7400 is based on Core architecture while the i5-2520M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7400 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the i5-2520M gets 34.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2520M is 1.4 times faster than the E7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7400 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the i5-2520M gets 34.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2520M is 1.4 times faster than the E7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
206a7
Core
Wolfdale
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2008
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
14.31k points
24.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.71k points
50.23k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E7400
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.54k
2.69k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
6.56k
7.28k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.73k
3.84k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.83k
3.05k (x1.67)
TOTAL
13.66k
16.86k (x1.23)
Multithread
E7400
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.08k
6.08k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
13.07k
16.15k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
8.87k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.62k
3.06k (x1.88)
TOTAL
25.29k
34.15k (x1.35)
Performance/W
E7400
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
78 points/W
174 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
201 points/W
461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
389 points/W
976 points/W
Performance/GHz
E7400
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
906 points/GHz
840 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2344 points/GHz
2275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1200 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
654 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
4879 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4