Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Celeron N2840
Description
The E7400 is based on Core architecture while the N2840 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7400 gets a score of 25.7 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E7400 is 1.5 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7400 gets a score of 25.7 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E7400 is 1.5 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
30678
Core
Wolfdale
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
1024 kB
Date
October 2008
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
14.31k points
10.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.71k points
16.79k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E7400
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
3.19k
4.8k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
7.02k
2.47k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.71k
1.86k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.39k
1.22k (x0.88)
TOTAL
14.31k
10.36k (x0.72)
Multithread
E7400
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
8.24k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
13.23k
4.19k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
3.05k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
1.32k (x0.98)
TOTAL
25.71k
16.79k (x0.65)
Performance/W
E7400
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
93 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
204 points/W
598 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
436 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
21 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
396 points/W
2399 points/W
Performance/GHz
E7400
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1139 points/GHz
1861 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2507 points/GHz
958 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
969 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
496 points/GHz
472 points/GHz
TOTAL
5111 points/GHz
4015 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4