Core 2 Duo E7200 vs Pentium 4415U
Description
The E7200 is based on Core architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7200 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 2.2 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7200 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 2.2 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
806e9
Core
Wolfdale
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2008
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
13.46k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.21k points
56.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E7200
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.33k
2.34k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
5.96k
9.51k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
3.05k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
2.59k (x1.78)
TOTAL
12.23k
17.49k (x1.43)
Multithread
E7200
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.65k
4.71k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
21.73k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.01k
7.35k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
2.43k (x1.98)
TOTAL
22.76k
36.22k (x1.59)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E7200
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.93k
8.29k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
6.48k
11.82k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.6k
3.09k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
4.18k (x2.88)
TOTAL
13.46k
27.39k (x2.03)
Multithread
E7200
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.85k
17.24k (x2.95)
Test#2 (FP)
12.91k
27.4k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.22k
7.44k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
4.31k (x3.5)
TOTAL
25.21k
56.39k (x2.24)
Performance/W
E7200
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
199 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
388 points/W
3759 points/W
Performance/GHz
E7200
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2558 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
574 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
5315 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4