| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E7200 vs T7100


Description
Both models E7200 and T7100 are based on Core architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7200 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E7200 is 2 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
6fd
Core
Wolfdale
Merom
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2008
May 2007
Mean monothread perf.
13.46k points
7.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.21k points
12.9k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E7200
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2.93k
2.08k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
6.48k
1.86k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.6k
1.86k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
1.25k (x0.86)
TOTAL
13.46k
7.05k (x0.52)

Multithread

E7200

T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
5.85k
4.16k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
12.91k
3.73k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.22k
3.73k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
1.28k (x1.04)
TOTAL
25.21k
12.9k (x0.51)

Performance/W
E7200
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
119 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
199 points/W
107 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
106 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
388 points/W
369 points/W

Performance/GHz
E7200
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2558 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
574 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
5315 points/GHz
3916 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4