| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E7200 vs T6500


Description
Both models E7200 and T6500 are based on Core architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7200 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the T6500 gets 9.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E7200 is 2.7 times faster than the T6500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
1067a
Core
Wolfdale
Penryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
2.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
FC-PGA 478
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2008
April 2009
Mean monothread perf.
13.46k points
10.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.21k points
9.17k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E7200
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.33k
0.07k (x0.03)
Test#2 (FP)
5.96k
3.11k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
0.62k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
1.02k (x0.7)
TOTAL
12.23k
4.82k (x0.39)

Multithread

E7200

T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.65k
1.2k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
3.18k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.01k
1.53k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
1.21k (x0.98)
TOTAL
22.76k
7.12k (x0.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E7200
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.93k
2.41k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
6.48k
5.31k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.6k
2.04k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
1.14k (x0.78)
TOTAL
13.46k
10.9k (x0.81)

Multithread

E7200

T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
5.85k
1.81k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
12.91k
4.55k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.22k
1.58k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
1.23k (x0.99)
TOTAL
25.21k
9.17k (x0.36)

Performance/W
E7200
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
52 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
199 points/W
130 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
45 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
388 points/W
262 points/W

Performance/GHz
E7200
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
1148 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2558 points/GHz
2530 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
972 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
574 points/GHz
542 points/GHz
TOTAL
5315 points/GHz
5192 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4