| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E7200 vs Core i3-6006U


Description
The E7200 is based on Core architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7200 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the i3-6006U gets 47.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.9 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
406e3
Core
Wolfdale
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2008
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
13.46k points
31.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.21k points
68.38k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E7200
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.33k
2.02k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
5.96k
8.2k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
2.63k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
3.92k (x2.7)
TOTAL
12.23k
16.77k (x1.37)

Multithread

E7200

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.65k
3.83k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
17.17k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.01k
5.77k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
3.62k (x2.94)
TOTAL
22.76k
30.39k (x1.34)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E7200
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.93k
7.28k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
6.48k
10.51k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.6k
2.81k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
2.88k (x1.98)
TOTAL
13.46k
23.48k (x1.74)

Multithread

E7200

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.85k
14.98k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
12.91k
23.68k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.22k
6.37k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
2.43k (x1.97)
TOTAL
25.21k
47.46k (x1.88)

Performance/W
E7200
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
998 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
199 points/W
1579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
425 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
388 points/W
3164 points/W

Performance/GHz
E7200
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
3640 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2558 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
574 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
5315 points/GHz
11739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4