Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Pentium G2020
Description
The E6550 is based on Core architecture while the G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6550 gets a score of 16.4 k points while the G2020 gets 42.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G2020 is 2.6 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6550 gets a score of 16.4 k points while the G2020 gets 42.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G2020 is 2.6 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
306a9
Core
Conroe
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.333 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.333 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2007
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
10.31k points
25.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.38k points
42.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6550
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.94k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
2.34k
8.23k (x3.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.35k
3.69k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
2.46k (x0.9)
TOTAL
9.75k
17.33k (x1.78)
Multithread
E6550
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
5.54k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
4.68k
15.47k (x3.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
7.06k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
2.99k (x2.37)
TOTAL
15.32k
31.05k (x2.03)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6550
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
2.7k
9.9k (x3.67)
Test#2 (FP)
2.43k
9.01k (x3.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
3.87k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
3.09k (x1.13)
TOTAL
10.31k
25.87k (x2.51)
Multithread
E6550
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
5.39k
18.83k (x3.49)
Test#2 (FP)
4.85k
14.15k (x2.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
6.61k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
2.81k (x2.24)
TOTAL
16.38k
42.39k (x2.59)
Performance/W
E6550
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
83 points/W
342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
75 points/W
257 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
75 points/W
120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
252 points/W
771 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6550
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
1156 points/GHz
3415 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
3107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1065 points/GHz
TOTAL
4417 points/GHz
8921 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4