Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Pentium 4417U
Description
The E6550 is based on Core architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6550 gets a score of 16.4 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 2.5 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6550 gets a score of 16.4 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 2.5 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
806ea
Core
Conroe
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.333 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
July 2007
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
10.31k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.38k points
41.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6550
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.7k
7.94k (x2.94)
Test#2 (FP)
2.43k
11.35k (x4.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
2.39k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
2.8k (x1.02)
TOTAL
10.31k
24.49k (x2.38)
Multithread
E6550
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.39k
13.1k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
4.85k
21.1k (x4.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
4.49k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
2.46k (x1.96)
TOTAL
16.38k
41.15k (x2.51)
Performance/W
E6550
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
83 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
75 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
75 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
252 points/W
2743 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6550
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
1156 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
4417 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4