Core 2 Duo E6550 vs E8200
Description
Both models E6550 and E8200 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6550 gets a score of 16.4 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.5 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6550 gets a score of 16.4 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.5 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
10676
Core
Conroe
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.333 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2007
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
10.31k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.38k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6550
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.7k
3k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
2.43k
6.62k (x2.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
2.55k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
3.6k (x1.32)
TOTAL
10.31k
15.77k (x1.53)
Multithread
E6550
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
5.39k
5.83k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
4.85k
12.64k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
4.97k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
1.95k (x1.55)
TOTAL
16.38k
25.39k (x1.55)
Performance/W
E6550
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
83 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
75 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
75 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
252 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6550
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1156 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
4417 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4