| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i7-930


Description
The E6550 is based on Core architecture while the i7-930 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6550 gets a score of 16.4 k points while the i7-930 gets 69.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-930 is 4.2 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fb
106a5
Core
Conroe
Bloomfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.333 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.333 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2007
February 2010
Mean monothread perf.
10.31k points
17.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.38k points
69.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6550
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
1.94k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
2.34k
4.38k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.35k
2.64k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
2.41k (x0.88)
TOTAL
9.75k
11.37k (x1.17)

Multithread

E6550

i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
7.3k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
4.68k
19.36k (x4.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
13.43k (x2.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
2.01k (x1.6)
TOTAL
15.32k
42.11k (x2.75)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6550
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
2.7k
7.28k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
2.43k
4.82k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
2.86k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
2.62k (x0.96)
TOTAL
10.31k
17.58k (x1.71)

Multithread

E6550

i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
5.39k
28.09k (x5.21)
Test#2 (FP)
4.85k
21.62k (x4.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
14.83k (x3.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
4.85k (x3.86)
TOTAL
16.38k
69.39k (x4.24)

Performance/W
E6550
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
83 points/W
216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
75 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
75 points/W
114 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
252 points/W
534 points/W

Performance/GHz
E6550
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
1156 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
1571 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
933 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
855 points/GHz
TOTAL
4417 points/GHz
5732 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4