Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Celeron N4100
Description
The E6550 is based on Core architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6550 gets a score of 16.4 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 2.5 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6550 gets a score of 16.4 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 2.5 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
706a1
Core
Conroe
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.333 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.333 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
July 2007
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
10.31k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.38k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6550
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
2.7k
4.72k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
2.43k
6.99k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
2.69k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
2.81k (x1.03)
TOTAL
10.31k
17.21k (x1.67)
Multithread
E6550
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
5.39k
12.54k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
4.85k
17.99k (x3.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
6.71k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
3.33k (x2.65)
TOTAL
16.38k
40.57k (x2.48)
Performance/W
E6550
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
83 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
75 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
75 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
252 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6550
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
1156 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
4417 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4