| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The E6550 is based on Core architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6550 gets a score of 16.4 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 4 times faster than the E6550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fb
810f10
Core
Conroe
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.333 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.333 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2007
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
10.31k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.38k points
71.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6550
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.63k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
2.34k
7.84k (x3.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.35k
3.63k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
2.93k (x1.08)
TOTAL
9.75k
17.02k (x1.75)

Multithread

E6550

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
5.77k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
4.68k
24.15k (x5.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
9.28k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
2.83k (x2.25)
TOTAL
15.32k
42.02k (x2.74)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6550
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.7k
11.67k (x4.33)
Test#2 (FP)
2.43k
14.02k (x5.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
4.53k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
2.93k (x1.07)
TOTAL
10.31k
33.14k (x3.22)

Multithread

E6550

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.39k
20.49k (x3.8)
Test#2 (FP)
4.85k
31.32k (x6.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
9.99k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
3.03k (x2.41)
TOTAL
16.38k
64.82k (x3.96)

Performance/W
E6550
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
83 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
75 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
75 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
252 points/W
4322 points/W

Performance/GHz
E6550
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1156 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
4417 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4