| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E4500 vs E8200


Description
Both models E4500 and E8200 are based on Core architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E4500 gets a score of 16 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.6 times faster than the E4500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fd
10676
Core
Allendale
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2007
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
8.33k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
15.97k points
25.39k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E4500
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.53k
3k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
6.62k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
2.55k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
3.6k (x3.01)
TOTAL
8.33k
15.77k (x1.89)

Multithread

E4500

E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
5.83k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
4.59k
12.64k (x2.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
4.97k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
1.95k (x1.1)
TOTAL
15.97k
25.39k (x1.59)

Performance/W
E4500
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
77 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
71 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
246 points/W
391 points/W

Performance/GHz
E4500
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1149 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1043 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
544 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
3786 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4