Core 2 Duo T5500 vs Celeron N3060
Description
The T5500 is based on Core architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T5500 gets a score of 11.8 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.1 times faster than the T5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T5500 gets a score of 11.8 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.1 times faster than the T5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f2
406c4
Core
Merom
Braswell
Base frecuency
1.667 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.66 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
Socket M
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
July 2006
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
6.41k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.81k points
13.36k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T5500
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1.93k
4.68k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
1.73k
2.74k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.74k
1.83k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
0.9k (x0.89)
TOTAL
6.41k
10.15k (x1.58)
Multithread
T5500
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
3.84k
6.31k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
3.43k
3.68k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
2.46k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
0.91k (x0.84)
TOTAL
11.81k
13.36k (x1.13)
Performance/W
T5500
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
110 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
98 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
31 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
337 points/W
2227 points/W
Performance/GHz
T5500
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1163 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1043 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1049 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
608 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
3863 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4