Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Pentium E5200 (R0)
Description
Both models E6600 and E5200 (R0) are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 16.1 k points while the E5200 (R0) gets 24.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (R0) is 1.5 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 16.1 k points while the E5200 (R0) gets 24.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (R0) is 1.5 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f6
1067a
Core
Conroe
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
July 2006
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
9.99k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.12k points
24.89k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6600
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2.38k
2.3k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
2.39k
5.9k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
2.47k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
1.21k (x0.44)
TOTAL
9.95k
11.89k (x1.2)
Multithread
E6600
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
4.63k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
4.68k
10.62k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.95k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
1.82k (x1.01)
TOTAL
15.86k
22.03k (x1.39)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6600
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2.7k
2.87k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
2.42k
6.42k (x2.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.41k
2.58k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
1.21k (x0.49)
TOTAL
9.99k
13.08k (x1.31)
Multithread
E6600
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
5.19k
5.74k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
4.55k
12.78k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
5.18k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.2k (x0.67)
TOTAL
16.12k
24.89k (x1.54)
Performance/W
E6600
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
80 points/W
88 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
70 points/W
197 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
248 points/W
383 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6600
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1125 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1009 points/GHz
2568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1025 points/GHz
485 points/GHz
TOTAL
4164 points/GHz
5232 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4