Core 2 Duo E6600 vs E4500
Description
Both models E6600 and E4500 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 16.1 k points while the E4500 gets 16 k points.
Summarizing, the E6600 is 1 times faster than the E4500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 16.1 k points while the E4500 gets 16 k points.
Summarizing, the E6600 is 1 times faster than the E4500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f6
6fd
Core
Conroe
Allendale
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
July 2006
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
9.99k points
8.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.12k points
15.97k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6600
E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.38k
2.2k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
2.39k
2.21k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
2.21k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
1.2k (x0.43)
TOTAL
9.95k
7.81k (x0.79)
Multithread
E6600
E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
4.4k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
4.68k
4.42k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.45k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
1.2k (x0.66)
TOTAL
15.86k
14.46k (x0.91)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6600
E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.7k
2.53k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
2.42k
2.29k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.41k
2.31k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
1.2k (x0.49)
TOTAL
9.99k
8.33k (x0.83)
Multithread
E6600
E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
5.19k
4.98k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
4.55k
4.59k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
4.63k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.77k (x0.99)
TOTAL
16.12k
15.97k (x0.99)
Performance/W
E6600
E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
80 points/W
77 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
70 points/W
71 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
248 points/W
246 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6600
E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1125 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1009 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1025 points/GHz
544 points/GHz
TOTAL
4164 points/GHz
3786 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4