Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Celeron J3455
Description
The E6600 is based on Core architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 16.1 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 2.9 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 16.1 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 2.9 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f6
506c9
Core
Conroe
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
July 2006
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
9.99k points
12.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.12k points
47.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6600
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
2.7k
6.02k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
2.42k
3.49k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.41k
2.01k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
1.47k (x0.6)
TOTAL
9.99k
12.98k (x1.3)
Multithread
E6600
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
5.19k
23.7k (x4.57)
Test#2 (FP)
4.55k
13.75k (x3.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
7.8k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2.09k (x1.17)
TOTAL
16.12k
47.34k (x2.94)
Performance/W
E6600
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
80 points/W
2370 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
70 points/W
1375 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71 points/W
780 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
248 points/W
4734 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6600
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
1125 points/GHz
2619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1009 points/GHz
1517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1025 points/GHz
637 points/GHz
TOTAL
4164 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4