Core 2 Duo E6320 vs Pentium T3400
Description
Both models E6320 and T3400 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6320 gets a score of 13.2 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 1.1 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6320 gets a score of 13.2 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 1.1 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f6
6fd
Core
Conroe
Merom-2M
Base frecuency
1.86 GHz
2.167 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
April 2007
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
8.24k points
8.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.19k points
14.91k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6320
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.86k
1.86k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
1.87k
1.9k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
1.42k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
0.84k (x0.46)
TOTAL
7.37k
6.01k (x0.82)
Multithread
E6320
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.68k
4.04k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
3.69k
4.17k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
3.55k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.06k
1.2k (x1.13)
TOTAL
12.03k
12.96k (x1.08)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6320
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.16k
2.49k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
2.25k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
2.17k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.2k
1.14k (x0.52)
TOTAL
8.24k
8.05k (x0.98)
Multithread
E6320
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.28k
4.98k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
3.82k
4.43k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.84k
4.27k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.23k (x0.98)
TOTAL
13.19k
14.91k (x1.13)
Performance/W
E6320
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
59 points/W
127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
203 points/W
426 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6320
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1162 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1045 points/GHz
1002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1183 points/GHz
526 points/GHz
TOTAL
4431 points/GHz
3714 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4