| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E6320 vs T7250


Description
Both models E6320 and T7250 are based on Core architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6320 gets a score of 13.2 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.

Summarizing, the T7250 is 1 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6f6
6fd
Core
Conroe
Merom
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.86 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2007
September 2007
Mean monothread perf.
8.24k points
7.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.19k points
13.82k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6320
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1.86k
1.96k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
1.87k
2k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
1.96k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
1.22k (x0.67)
TOTAL
7.37k
7.14k (x0.97)

Multithread

E6320

T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
3.68k
3.87k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
3.69k
3.95k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
3.8k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.06k
1.34k (x1.26)
TOTAL
12.03k
12.96k (x1.08)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6320
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
2.16k
2.27k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
2.07k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
2.01k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.2k
1.22k (x0.56)
TOTAL
8.24k
7.57k (x0.92)

Multithread

E6320

T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
4.28k
4.51k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
3.82k
4.09k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.84k
3.9k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.32k (x1.05)
TOTAL
13.19k
13.82k (x1.05)

Performance/W
E6320
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
59 points/W
117 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
203 points/W
395 points/W

Performance/GHz
E6320
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1162 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1045 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1183 points/GHz
611 points/GHz
TOTAL
4431 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4