Core 2 Duo E6320 vs T7100
Description
Both models E6320 and T7100 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6320 gets a score of 13.2 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E6320 is 1 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6320 gets a score of 13.2 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E6320 is 1 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f6
6fd
Core
Conroe
Merom
Base frecuency
1.86 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2007
May 2007
Mean monothread perf.
8.24k points
7.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.19k points
12.9k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6320
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2.16k
2.08k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
1.86k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
1.86k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.2k
1.25k (x0.57)
TOTAL
8.24k
7.05k (x0.86)
Multithread
E6320
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.28k
4.16k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
3.82k
3.73k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.84k
3.73k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.28k (x1.03)
TOTAL
13.19k
12.9k (x0.98)
Performance/W
E6320
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
119 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
59 points/W
107 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59 points/W
106 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
203 points/W
369 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6320
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
1162 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1045 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1183 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
4431 points/GHz
3916 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4