Core 2 Duo E6320 vs E7200
Description
Both models E6320 and E7200 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6320 gets a score of 13.2 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E7200 is 1.9 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6320 gets a score of 13.2 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E7200 is 1.9 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f6
10676
Core
Conroe
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.86 GHz
2.533 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2007
April 2008
Mean monothread perf.
8.24k points
13.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.19k points
25.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6320
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
1.86k
2.33k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
1.87k
5.96k (x3.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
2.5k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
1.45k (x0.8)
TOTAL
7.37k
12.23k (x1.66)
Multithread
E6320
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
3.68k
4.65k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
3.69k
11.87k (x3.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
5.01k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.06k
1.23k (x1.16)
TOTAL
12.03k
22.76k (x1.89)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6320
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.16k
2.93k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
6.48k (x3.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
2.6k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.2k
1.45k (x0.66)
TOTAL
8.24k
13.46k (x1.63)
Multithread
E6320
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.28k
5.85k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
3.82k
12.91k (x3.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.84k
5.22k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.23k (x0.98)
TOTAL
13.19k
25.21k (x1.91)
Performance/W
E6320
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
59 points/W
199 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
203 points/W
388 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6320
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
1162 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1045 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1183 points/GHz
574 points/GHz
TOTAL
4431 points/GHz
5315 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4