| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E6320 vs Core i3-4030U


Description
The E6320 is based on Core architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6320 gets a score of 13.2 k points while the i3-4030U gets 36.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 2.8 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6f6
40651
Core
Conroe
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.86 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2007
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
8.24k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.19k points
46.09k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6320
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.86k
2.14k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
1.87k
5.4k (x2.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
2.37k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
2.01k (x1.11)
TOTAL
7.37k
11.93k (x1.62)

Multithread

E6320

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.68k
3.94k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
3.69k
13.68k (x3.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
5.78k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.06k
2.44k (x2.3)
TOTAL
12.03k
25.84k (x2.15)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6320
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.16k
6.7k (x3.1)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
5.99k (x3.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
2.65k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.2k
2.13k (x0.97)
TOTAL
8.24k
17.47k (x2.12)

Multithread

E6320

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.28k
14.3k (x3.34)
Test#2 (FP)
3.82k
13.83k (x3.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.84k
6.12k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
2.48k (x1.98)
TOTAL
13.19k
36.74k (x2.78)

Performance/W
E6320
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
953 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
59 points/W
922 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59 points/W
408 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
203 points/W
2449 points/W

Performance/GHz
E6320
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1162 points/GHz
3525 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
3150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1045 points/GHz
1395 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1183 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
TOTAL
4431 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4