Core 2 Duo E6320 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The E6320 is based on Core architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6320 gets a score of 13.2 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 6.1 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6320 gets a score of 13.2 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 6.1 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f6
100fa0
Core
Conroe
Thuban
Base frecuency
1.86 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.86 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2007
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
8.24k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.19k points
80.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6320
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.86k
1.98k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
1.87k
4.57k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
2.57k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
3.51k (x1.94)
TOTAL
7.37k
12.64k (x1.71)
Multithread
E6320
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.68k
11.86k (x3.23)
Test#2 (FP)
3.69k
27.4k (x7.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
15.39k (x4.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.06k
3.46k (x3.26)
TOTAL
12.03k
58.11k (x4.83)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6320
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.16k
5.17k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
5.33k (x2.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
2.76k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.2k
3.51k (x1.6)
TOTAL
8.24k
16.77k (x2.03)
Multithread
E6320
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.28k
29.82k (x6.97)
Test#2 (FP)
3.82k
30.79k (x8.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.84k
15.88k (x4.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
3.69k (x2.95)
TOTAL
13.19k
80.19k (x6.08)
Performance/W
E6320
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
59 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
203 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6320
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1162 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1045 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1183 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
4431 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4