| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E6320 vs Athlon II M300


Description
The E6320 is based on Core architecture while the M300 is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6320 gets a score of 13.2 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.

Summarizing, the M300 is 1.3 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6f6
100f62
Core
Conroe
Caspian
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.86 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket S1G3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
April 2007
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
8.24k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.19k points
17.73k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6320
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.16k
2.66k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
3.84k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
1.97k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.2k
1.1k (x0.5)
TOTAL
8.24k
9.57k (x1.16)

Multithread

E6320

M300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.28k
5.04k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
3.82k
7.46k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.84k
3.75k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.48k (x1.18)
TOTAL
13.19k
17.73k (x1.34)

Performance/W
E6320
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
144 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
59 points/W
213 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59 points/W
107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
203 points/W
506 points/W

Performance/GHz
E6320
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
1162 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1041 points/GHz
1921 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1045 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1183 points/GHz
550 points/GHz
TOTAL
4431 points/GHz
4784 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4