| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E6300 vs Pentium N3540


Description
The E6300 is based on Core architecture while the N3540 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6300 gets a score of 12 k points while the N3540 gets 37.5 k points.

Summarizing, the N3540 is 3.1 times faster than the E6300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6f2
30678
Core
Conroe
Bay Trail-M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.866 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.866 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
July 2006
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
6.87k points
10.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.05k points
37.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6300
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1.82k
1.37k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
1.83k
2k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
1.95k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.24k
1.21k (x0.98)
TOTAL
6.75k
6.53k (x0.97)

Multithread

E6300

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
3.51k
5.24k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
3.59k
7.69k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.49k
7.31k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
1.52k (x1.18)
TOTAL
11.87k
21.76k (x1.83)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6300
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
2.09k
4.97k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
2.58k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.79k
1.98k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
1.2k (x1.13)
TOTAL
6.87k
10.72k (x1.56)

Multithread

E6300

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
3.65k
18.92k (x5.18)
Test#2 (FP)
3.76k
9.67k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.61k
7.37k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.03k
1.54k (x1.5)
TOTAL
12.05k
37.5k (x3.11)

Performance/W
E6300
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
56 points/W
2703 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
58 points/W
1382 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55 points/W
1053 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
185 points/W
5357 points/W

Performance/GHz
E6300
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1121 points/GHz
1864 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1038 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
961 points/GHz
741 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
564 points/GHz
448 points/GHz
TOTAL
3684 points/GHz
4020 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4