Core 2 Duo E6300 vs E6320
Description
Both models E6300 and E6320 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6300 gets a score of 12 k points while the E6320 gets 13.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E6320 is 1.1 times faster than the E6300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6300 gets a score of 12 k points while the E6320 gets 13.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E6320 is 1.1 times faster than the E6300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f2
6f6
Core
Conroe
Conroe
Base frecuency
1.866 GHz
1.86 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2006
April 2007
Mean monothread perf.
6.87k points
8.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.05k points
13.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6300
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
1.82k
1.86k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
1.83k
1.87k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
1.83k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.24k
1.81k (x1.46)
TOTAL
6.75k
7.37k (x1.09)
Multithread
E6300
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
3.51k
3.68k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
3.59k
3.69k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.49k
3.6k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
1.06k (x0.82)
TOTAL
11.87k
12.03k (x1.01)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6300
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
2.09k
2.16k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
1.94k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.79k
1.94k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
2.2k (x2.09)
TOTAL
6.87k
8.24k (x1.2)
Multithread
E6300
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
3.65k
4.28k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
3.76k
3.82k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.61k
3.84k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.03k
1.25k (x1.22)
TOTAL
12.05k
13.19k (x1.1)
Performance/W
E6300
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
56 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
58 points/W
59 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55 points/W
59 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
185 points/W
203 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6300
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
1121 points/GHz
1162 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1038 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
961 points/GHz
1045 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
564 points/GHz
1183 points/GHz
TOTAL
3684 points/GHz
4431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4