| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E6300 vs Celeron N3060


Description
The E6300 is based on Core architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6300 gets a score of 12 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.

Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.1 times faster than the E6300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6f2
406c4
Core
Conroe
Braswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.866 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.866 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
July 2006
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
6.87k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.05k points
13.36k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6300
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
2.09k
4.68k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
2.74k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.79k
1.83k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
0.9k (x0.86)
TOTAL
6.87k
10.15k (x1.48)

Multithread

E6300

N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
3.65k
6.31k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
3.76k
3.68k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.61k
2.46k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.03k
0.91k (x0.89)
TOTAL
12.05k
13.36k (x1.11)

Performance/W
E6300
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
56 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
58 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
185 points/W
2227 points/W

Performance/GHz
E6300
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1121 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1038 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
961 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
564 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
3684 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4