Core m7-6Y75 vs Xeon E5-2620
Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 4.2 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 4.2 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
206d7
Core
Skylake-Y
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
4,5 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
15360 kB
Date
September 2015
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
224.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
6.95k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
6.24k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
3.05k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
2.56k (x0.48)
TOTAL
33.86k
18.8k (x0.56)
Multithread
m7-6Y75
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
90.01k (x5.36)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
82.43k (x3.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
42.59k (x6.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
9.66k (x1.73)
TOTAL
53.58k
224.7k (x4.19)
Performance/W
m7-6Y75
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
2365 points/W
Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4