Core m7-6Y75 vs i7-4790
Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-4790 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the i7-4790 gets 150.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790 is 2.8 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the i7-4790 gets 150.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790 is 2.8 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
306c3
Core
Skylake-Y
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
4,5 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2015
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
44.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
173.89k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
14.07k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
12.63k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
5.35k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
4.98k (x0.94)
TOTAL
33.86k
37.03k (x1.09)
Multithread
m7-6Y75
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
57.88k (x3.45)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
60.83k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
24.4k (x3.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
6.95k (x1.25)
TOTAL
53.58k
150.07k (x2.8)
Performance/W
m7-6Y75
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
689 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
724 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
291 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
83 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
1786 points/W
Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
3518 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
9258 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4