| | | | | | |

Core m7-6Y75 vs i7-2600


Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-2600 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the i7-2600 gets 93.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-2600 is 1.7 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
206a7
Core
Skylake-Y
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
4,5 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2015
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
28.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
93.69k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
10.03k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
8.91k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
4.34k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
5.41k (x1.02)
TOTAL
33.86k
28.68k (x0.85)

Multithread

m7-6Y75

i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
37.69k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
34.22k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
17.65k (x2.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
4.13k (x0.74)
TOTAL
53.58k
93.69k (x1.75)

Performance/W
m7-6Y75
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
360 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
186 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
43 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
986 points/W

Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
2639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1141 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1425 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
7549 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4