Core m7-6Y75 vs i5-5200U
Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
306d4
Core
Skylake-Y
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /4
TDP
4,5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2015
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
68.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
8.48k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
12.03k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
3.32k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
2.79k (x0.53)
TOTAL
33.86k
26.62k (x0.79)
Multithread
m7-6Y75
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
15.19k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
25.99k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
6.71k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
2.96k (x0.53)
TOTAL
53.58k
50.85k (x0.95)
Performance/W
m7-6Y75
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
1013 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
1733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
3390 points/W
Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
3140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
9860 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4