| | | | | | |

Core m7-6Y75 vs i5-3317U


Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the i5-3317U gets 41.3 k points.

Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-Y
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
4,5 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2015
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
17.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
41.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
6.11k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
6.58k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
2.48k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
2.71k (x0.51)
TOTAL
33.86k
17.88k (x0.53)

Multithread

m7-6Y75

i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
13.67k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
16.8k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
6.66k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
4.17k (x0.75)
TOTAL
53.58k
41.31k (x0.77)

Performance/W
m7-6Y75
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
392 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
246 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
2430 points/W

Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
2351 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
2532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
6879 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4