| | | | | | |

Core m7-6Y75 vs i3-3220


Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the i3-3220 gets 55.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-3220 is 1 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-Y
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
4,5 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2015
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
25.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
55.82k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
8.29k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
9.1k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
3.93k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
3.74k (x0.7)
TOTAL
33.86k
25.06k (x0.74)

Multithread

m7-6Y75

i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
19.26k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
24.65k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
8.75k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
3.15k (x0.57)
TOTAL
53.58k
55.82k (x1.04)

Performance/W
m7-6Y75
i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
448 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
159 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
1015 points/W

Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
2513 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
2756 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
7593 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4