Core m7-6Y75 vs M-5Y10c
Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.1 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.1 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
306d4
Core
Skylake-Y
Broadwell-Y
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
4,5 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
51k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
7.22k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
9.98k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
2.75k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
2.98k (x0.56)
TOTAL
33.86k
22.93k (x0.68)
Multithread
m7-6Y75
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
15.07k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
24.8k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
6.68k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
4.46k (x0.8)
TOTAL
53.58k
51k (x0.95)
Performance/W
m7-6Y75
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
10200 points/W
Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4