Core m7-6Y75 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the 2200U gets 68.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.3 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the 2200U gets 68.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.3 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
810f10
Core
Skylake-Y
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
4,5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
71.02k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
11.54k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
19.69k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
4.55k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
3.25k (x0.61)
TOTAL
33.86k
39.03k (x1.15)
Multithread
m7-6Y75
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
19.25k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
36.27k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
10.2k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
3.07k (x0.55)
TOTAL
53.58k
68.8k (x1.28)
Performance/W
m7-6Y75
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
1283 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
2418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
680 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
205 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
4586 points/W
Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
3394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
5792 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
956 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
11480 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4