Core m7-6Y75 vs FX 8120
Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the 8120 is based on Bulldozer.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the 8120 gets 70.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 8120 is 1.3 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the 8120 gets 70.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 8120 is 1.3 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
600f12
Core
Skylake-Y
Zambezi
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
4,5 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+8x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2015
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
23.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
70.78k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
9.31k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
6.85k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
2.77k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
4.58k (x0.86)
TOTAL
33.86k
23.5k (x0.69)
Multithread
m7-6Y75
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
25.84k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
28.49k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
13.84k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
2.61k (x0.47)
TOTAL
53.58k
70.78k (x1.32)
Performance/W
m7-6Y75
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
207 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
21 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
566 points/W
Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
2327 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
1712 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
693 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4