Core m7-6Y75 vs FX 6300
Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the 6300 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the 6300 gets 66.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.2 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the 6300 gets 66.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.2 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
600f20
Core
Skylake-Y
Vishera
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
4,5 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2015
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
23.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
66.43k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
7.71k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
7.41k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
2.81k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
5.2k (x0.98)
TOTAL
33.86k
23.14k (x0.68)
Multithread
m7-6Y75
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
25.2k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
25.83k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
11.47k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
3.92k (x0.7)
TOTAL
53.58k
66.43k (x1.24)
Performance/W
m7-6Y75
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
699 points/W
Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
1951 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
741 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
6088 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4