| | | | | | |

Core m7-6Y75 vs Athlon 5150 APU


Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the 5150 APU is based on Jaguar.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.

Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.8 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
700f01
Core
Skylake-Y
Kabini
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
AM1
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
4,5 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
256 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
8.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
30.06k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
3.02k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
2.62k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
1.59k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
1.02k (x0.19)
TOTAL
33.86k
8.26k (x0.24)

Multithread

m7-6Y75

5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
12.06k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
10.42k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
6.32k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
1.26k (x0.23)
TOTAL
53.58k
30.06k (x0.56)

Performance/W
m7-6Y75
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
483 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
417 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
1203 points/W

Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
5162 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4