Core m7-6Y75 vs A9 9420
Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the 9420 gets 26.2 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 2 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the 9420 gets 26.2 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 2 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
670f00
Core
Skylake-Y
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
4,5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
46.33k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
7.55k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
13.9k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
3.11k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
2.18k (x0.41)
TOTAL
33.86k
26.74k (x0.79)
Multithread
m7-6Y75
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
9.09k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
12.25k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
3k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
1.81k (x0.32)
TOTAL
53.58k
26.15k (x0.49)
Performance/W
m7-6Y75
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
606 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
817 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
1743 points/W
Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
2096 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
3862 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
864 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
604 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
7427 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4