Core m7-6Y75 vs A4 6300B
Description
The m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake architecture while the 6300B is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.9 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m7-6Y75 gets a score of 53.6 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.9 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
610f31
Core
Skylake-Y
Richland
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
4,5 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
September 2015
December 2013
Mean monothread perf.
33.86k points
20.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.58k points
27.54k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
m7-6Y75
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
10.24k
8.35k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
7.31k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
2.95k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.32k
1.51k (x0.28)
TOTAL
33.86k
20.11k (x0.59)
Multithread
m7-6Y75
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
16.78k
10.88k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
10.01k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
5.02k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.58k
1.63k (x0.29)
TOTAL
53.58k
27.54k (x0.51)
Performance/W
m7-6Y75
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
4195 points/W
167 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6272 points/W
154 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1534 points/W
77 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1394 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
13395 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
m7-6Y75
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
3304 points/GHz
2140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4945 points/GHz
1873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
756 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
387 points/GHz
TOTAL
10922 points/GHz
5157 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4