Core m3-7Y30 vs Xeon E3-1220 v3
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 2.7 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 2.7 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake
Haswell-WS
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
4.5 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2016
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
140.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
19.17k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
10.55k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
4.79k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.65k (x1.08)
TOTAL
25.6k
39.16k (x1.53)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
73.13k (x3.36)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
42.06k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
18.03k (x3.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
7.54k (x1.35)
TOTAL
52.78k
140.76k (x2.67)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
1759 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4