Core m3-7Y30 vs i7-7700HQ
Description
Both models m3-7Y30 and i7-7700HQ are based on Kaby Lake architecture.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 3.9 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 3.9 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
906e9
Core
Kaby Lake
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
4.5 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
208.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
23.27k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
20.35k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
4.76k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
7.92k (x1.84)
TOTAL
25.6k
56.29k (x2.2)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
93.11k (x4.28)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
89.03k (x4.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
21.29k (x4.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
4.9k (x0.88)
TOTAL
52.78k
208.33k (x3.95)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
2069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
1978 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
4629 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
6124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
5354 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
2083 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
14813 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4