| | | | | | |

Core m3-7Y30 vs i7-4770


Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-4770 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i7-4770 gets 184 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4770 is 3.5 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
4.5 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2016
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
45.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
184k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
23.02k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
11.89k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
5.29k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.98k (x1.16)
TOTAL
25.6k
45.19k (x1.77)

Multithread

m3-7Y30

i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
94.23k (x4.33)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
59.02k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
25.06k (x5.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
5.69k (x1.02)
TOTAL
52.78k
184k (x3.49)

Performance/W
m3-7Y30
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
1122 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
703 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
2191 points/W

Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
5902 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
11586 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4