Core m3-7Y30 vs i5-6400
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-6400 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i5-6400 gets 174.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 3.3 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i5-6400 gets 174.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 3.3 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
506e3
Core
Kaby Lake
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
4.5 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
48.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
174.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
21.1k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
18.28k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
4.22k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.45k (x1.03)
TOTAL
25.6k
48.05k (x1.88)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
80.03k (x3.68)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
71.1k (x3.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
16.19k (x3.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
6.73k (x1.21)
TOTAL
52.78k
174.05k (x3.3)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
1231 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
2678 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
6394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1279 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
14560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4